And, by that, I mean those opposing the Left should be working – in both the Democratic Party and GOP, to take over the framework that nominates the next party leaders, and controls the party apparatus.
Over at Conservative Hardliner, there is a breakdown of the step-by-step process that can give the back of our hands to Mittens and his ilk.
It will take time. It cannot be our only focus. But, with HALF of the precinct committee slots vacant, it’s an easy strategy to put into place.
Ohio has a solid website, that has information pertinent to the process. There is also a downloadable book (several chapters) that seems worth reading. This is not just important for this 2020 election; we will need to support those non-RINOs that do exist, and help them build a strong precinct. From that will come the next generation of leaders.
Guys (in the generic sense, no disrespect to the women), we are the core. If the Revolution stops with us, we’re done. We need to be bringing on board our replacements, ASAP. We need to reach out, and slot them into available places, always looking for those who might move to the next level. Training is critical; realizing that we are NOT irreplaceable is right up there in importance.
There are enough of us to take over the existing structure; rather than splintering it into insignificance, let’s do an end run around the Never-Trumps and Let’s-Be-Proper-When-We-Lose types.
Are You Ready to Rumble?
We often complain about the GOP leadership in the House and Senate. We SHOULD be keeping a closer eye on the dunderheads in the states, who can do far more damage at that local level.
A prime example is the decision of GOP governors to agree to accept “refugees” into their states, including the state of my birth, Ohio (dumba$$ governor is Mike DeWine).
[NOTE: anyone wanting to challenge DeWine for the GOP nomination next time, send me a comment.]
This has been reported to be “just” a payback for those brave aliens who worked for the Americans, and now face persecution in their home countries. If these were the only aliens involved, most of us would say, well, OK.
That assertion is, however, a lie.
Such aliens would be eligible for Special Immigrant Visas; these guys are not, or they would seek them.
This action is to facilitate the State Dept. bringing in Yet Another Batch of Leftists (YABL, rhymes with rabble and babble), who will be – after a laughably short time – eligible for ALL benefits, including housing, welfare, EBT, as well as the very lucrative “family reunification” that brings in marginally-related and unrelated aliens, for a price.
Can you say Chain Migration?
It is such a process that enabled Ilhan to enter the USA, and to bring in her husband/brother, as well. Even Snopes cannot label that allegation as False, merely smearing it with the label Unproven. Snopes’ efforts to uncover the truth are laughably weak. Even a cursory look at the facts brings up some eyebrow-raising information.
Look, I’ve known many people from the Middle East over the years. In Lakewood, my hometown, and Cleveland, where I spent much of my adult life, I had Arabs as neighbors and friends. Some of them Christian, some of them Muslim (often only weak adherents). I liked them.
One thing I learned is not to trust the surface. Many of them were kind, genial, and seemingly decent persons.
However, shady business practices, including food stamp fraud, selling stolen or outdated merchandise, and rampant immigration fraud were the norm. Yes, NORM.
They didn’t see it as a crime, just helping out a family member or otherwise-allied person. They regularly engaged in marriage fraud. The Catholic ones would do so by coercing their teens to marry someone who couldn’t get a visa the normal way in a civil marriage. After they received their papers, the American was permitted to get a divorce, and marry the one they had wanted to all along. But, the first marriage was “for the family”.
The Muslims had no such concerns about divorce, and would engage in that practice to further their family’s finances and for political alliances.
So, unlike some bloggers, I’m not suggesting Ilhan and her brother or step-brother or half-brother (any of these are possible) engaged in some sort of incestuous relations. This was NOT about sex.
Understand, sex generally wasn’t involved. They would claim it was, for the INS, but this wasn’t about sex. It was about trading favors, paying off debts, getting some cash for investments, and the like.
Today’s immigrants will often have one or more children, just to solidify their claim on America. They are aware that Americans are reluctant to break up families, so having that connection makes them virtually deportation-proof.
Just figured I’d drop a quick screed at Francis’s place:
Also, one of my resolutions… at least one post a week here. Last year was few and far between!
I’ve gone through the site and done something of an overhaul for the end of the year. If you were having any problems posting/editing/commenting, they should be resolved.
If you encounter and problems or bugs in the near future, let me know!
The concept of inbreeding dangers is well known in biology – the more often the family tree intertwines, the greater the dangers of congenital birth defects – those defects that are in the genes.
Most of us carry some defective genes – we might only be aware of the dominant ones. Recessive genes, as they only represent when the other parent also passes one on, may ‘hide’ for generations.
Those recessive traits will naturally turn up more often when both parents share common ancestors. Such was a problem with many of the ruling families of Europe in the mid- to late-20th century. As the number of royal families dwindled, their heirs had fewer choices for partners.
Marriage outside of the extended family? This led to less stability in the power elite, who had less of a stake in supporting the monarchies.
The same dynamic comes into play with some cultures that limit their breeding pool to extended family members. In some parts of the world (most notably with Muslim cultures, Arabic or not), marriage with even relatively close family members is encouraged – cousins, uncles, etc.
What has this led to?
Astounding levels of genetic diseases among these families.
I don’t see this changing much soon. The practice, as mentioned above, also increase group/familial cohesion, and keeps the money (bride-price) in the family. Other than forcing genetic testing on prospective spouses before issuing a visa (unlikely in the current climate of Western Countries, and likely to lead to cheating on the tests), I don’t see this changing in the near future.
My suggestion? A complete ban on immigration for a generation or two. It’s the solution that finally began to get the Sicilians to marry outside of the gene pool.
By 1930, more than two-thirds of immigrants had applied for citizenship and almost all reported they could speak some English. A third of first-generation immigrants who arrived unmarried and more than half of second-generation immigrants wed spouses from outside their cultural group.
The Immigration Act of 1924 virtually shut down Italian immigration (among other groups), and led to their assimilation through intermarriage to other groups.
If a person chooses to marry someone from “the Old Country”?
Fine. You can either live apart until such time as that person qualifies for NON-family visa status, or – my preference – go to that country and live there – permanently. No, your citizen status should NOT transfer to your children, as you will be subject to the laws of your spouse’s country. Naturally, those serving in the US military are exempt.
Add on a provision that no person who has been naturalized may themselves sponsor another immigrant, and you’ll go a long way towards reducing chain migration.
Is this a sign that I’m anti-Non-Whites?
In America, at this time, we have a lot of indigenous citizens who, as far as I am concerned, get first call on any charitable or government assistance to reach economic independence. Americans First.