Every time I sat down to write this post, something else came up, and so it’s been on a delay for a while. However, it’s a very important topic, so today I sat down and forced myself to finish it.
It all began when I was reading a post from Sarah Hoyt, called About that Matriarchy. The thing of it is, she’s entirely correct. We don’t live in a Patriarchy, we live in a Matriarchy that disguises itself with the skin of a Patriarchy, just like any other Marxist-controlled institution, really. Sure, men are nominally at the top of the power pyramid still, though that edge is slowly falling away. College education greatly favors women now, the last I checked at a rate of about 60/40. HR departments are overwhelmingly female. And middle management is heading that way, too. Eventually that will crossover to upper management and political representation. Remember, this is on something of a generational delay timer.
But in the meantime you might ask how I could make such a claim. Sarah, having grown up in an actual Patriarchy (which she describes in her post) explains for us:
I knew the US was a matriarchy from the moment in the airport when I was waiting for my plane to come over and get married and watched a very overweight, inappropriately dressed middle aged woman boss her husband and sons around. (It occurred to me the other day that I probably now resemble her. Eh.)
Only in a matriarchy are all men shown as idiots in every commercial; is every boss on tv a woman; are women treated like they have special and holy insight.
ONLY in a matriarchy can a bunch of women suddenly deciding that events thirty years ago still apply today (77 is not now, and now any guy saying sleep with me or else will be taken to court. Unless he’s in Hollywood, publishing, the news or politics, and, oh, yeah, leftist) have men scurrying to come up with #Ihave. When they OBVIOUSLY and painfully not only haven’t but couldn’t being to.
When she talks about TV commercials, she may be channeling an earlier post here at The Declination: Pop Culture, Commercials, and White Guys. Or perhaps she merely came to the same conclusion independently. Either way, a Matriarchy is not as obvious or blunt as a Patriarchy. Given the general personality characteristics of women, and how they often differ from men, we should not expect it to manifest in the same way.
Christina Hoff Summers explains for us in this video:
Masculinity is variously regarded as toxic, sexist, and at the very least in need of close monitoring and modification. The gold standard for personal behavior is the feminine, not the masculine. In essence, our society is asking why men aren’t more like women. And the needs and views of women are prioritized over men. This is often expressed as something like “happy wife, happy life” or “I put her needs first.” This isn’t even seen as particularly good behavior, rather it is the bare minimum. If you don’t think this way, you’re obviously a bad man.
Notice in the following poster how the woman is assumed to be the victim, even though the poster tells us both individuals were drunk:
A woman who is intoxicated cannot consent, but apparently a man who is intoxicated can and is automatically assumed to have done so. This entire campaign is centered around a distinctly female perspective. It’s not hard to find examples of this kind of thinking everywhere. Even the value system the West adheres to these days – at least publicly – is distinctly feminine. It’s a sort of ‘everybody just get along, and let’s all share’ passive-aggressive demand for conformity. It is the kind of thing you would see in a daycare run primarily by, you guessed it, women.
Sarah explains better than I can:
Women, being smaller and slighter and weaker than men have no built in brakes. If we go to war, we go to war till the enemy is pieces.
The feminists who convinced American women that men were the enemy, at least as far back as I’ve been in the country, unleashed a monster that most of them didn’t anticipate or understand.
Ain’t momma happy ain’t nobody happy. And momma knows that she can’t hold her men by force, so she must berate them and berate them and berate them, until they confess to things they wouldn’t dream of doing.
The constant accusations of racism, sexism, whatever… that are heaped upon men, especially straight white men (but other male demographics still get some of it), is off the scale. White men can do nothing that will satisfy anyone, anymore. If a white guy invented a cure for cancer, tomorrow we’d hear that he was a secret sexist because he said something hasty on Twitter once.
Meanwhile, if a woman does something a thousand men have done before her, we’ll be hearing about it for months. One of my favorite examples is this headline:
This is another case of people forgetting men even matter at all. Avery Brooks (a black man) played the lead character, Benjamin Sisko, in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine over 20 years before this woman was cast in Star Trek:Discovery. But it doesn’t matter, because Sonequa is a woman. Sometimes you don’t even have to be a white male to get shafted this way, you just have to be a man. The female perspective is the only one that really matters in pop culture.
A hundred men could, for example, fly to Mars, and yes it would make headlines for a while. And people would praise the scientific achievement (even though it’s more of an engineering achievement, but that’s a separate post). But when the first woman goes, it won’t just be a mere scientific achievement, it will be an historic moment for all women, and for social justice, equality, fairness, and a thousand other Marxist buzzwords that don’t really mean what they say. Women matter more than science or engineering. Women matter more than anything.
Here’s a little social experiment to close:
The woman is always the victim. Even when, paradoxically, she’s doing the hitting. If a woman hits a man, it’s all smiles, laughter, and the occasional “you go girl” messages of encouragement. The reverse, of course, is anathema. Now, some of my readers may wonder about the difference, after all the Patriarchal way of doing things (at least in the more recent past) was generally to not hit women either. The difference is, in those days, it was understood that this was predicated on women not hitting men. If a woman started hitting a man in public in, say, the Victorian age, there would be no messages of encouragement or laughter. It would have been view with horror and embarrassment. People would think she was mental. Today, she’s a hero fighting the evil sexists, or at least entitled to hit her man as much as she wants.
Radical feminism has embraced the penultimate line of the strange 70s movie Zardoz: “The Penis is Evil.” Of course, the first line is one they’d view with horror: “The Gun is Good.” But that’s because, in the minds of feminists, the gun is nothing more than an extended penis anyway. Certainly, comparing gun ownership with penis size is common enough among them.
Either way, Sarah Hoyt is right. I can’t speak for her native Portugal, but I can say with some degree of certainty, as she does, that America is a Matriarchy. And in other Western nations I’ve visited, I’ve seen little to convince me otherwise.
What strikes me hardest about this subject is the enormous amount of cognitive dissonance one must be prepared to absorb without goggling at it, to reach the conclusion that America is a patriarchal society. Men routinely sacrifice everything for their wives and children. If we’re to retain our self-respect, and the respect we desire from other men, we have essentially no alternatives except lifelong celibacy.
I’m on record as stating that men are the superior sex: in our physical and intellectual capabilities, our morals and ethics, and our willingness to subordinate our personal interests to higher priorities. No woman has ever dared to challenge me on it. That’s probably evidence of residual female wisdom…though at this point I know better than to lay a large bet on it.
The Return of Patriarchy
http://takimag.com/article/the_return_of_patriarchy_christopher_degroot/print#disqus_thread
As far as I’m concerned, an excellent role model for men is Humphrey Bogart in “The Maltese Falcon” and “The Big Sleep.” Use that as a guide, and women will respect you.
“women will respect you”
not interested.
Watch those movies. You’ll see what I mean.
I’m surprised you didn’t mention Kate Mulgrew’s Janeway. Sonequa is not even the first female Star Trek lead. Oh the humanity!
Rule one: If the left says she’s the first, she is the first.
Rule two: If this is obviously false see rule one.
Well we’ll see how far ‘Girrrrl’ power gets us when the barbarians arrive in force. Remember, sooner or later barbarians always try and conquer the reigning civilization.
even in a matriarchal society, men will be on top, because to be the best usually means taking the biggest risks. men succeed more because men also fail more, it’s always been up to us to make sacrifices for civilization.
plus, women are just plain losers.
“If a white guy invented a cure for cancer, tomorrow we’d hear that he was a secret sexist because he said something hasty on Twitter once.”
We don’t have to speculate. It’s happened: the Shirtstorm.
The sad thing is his lady friend made it for him to wear for the occasion. She was reportedly furious at the feminazis and media for their phony outrage.
Had some tenants in the garage apartment. She was a harridan. Maybe 5’10”, about 250 pounds. He was about 5’5″, 120. She would beat the shit out of him, and then he’d spend the weekend in jail. Sometimes in hospital. Then he’d go to work in the morning, and give her his paycheck on Fridays, ’cause he loved his daughter.
Before a man marries, one thing he should get straight:
Who is the captain who is the first mate,
Who mops standing up or who scrubs on his knees,
A man’s entitled to decisions like these.
I’m the boss. (There’s no doubt of it)
I’m the boss. (And he’s proud of it)
I make the decisions and mine is the final one.
Don’t tell me how the dishes should be done.
My woman and I we live in tranquillity.
Don’t ask how to spell it; I’m not nobility.
I say men are smarter and my woman agrees.
What I cook for supper should be up to me.
Take my advice, friend: stay in the driver’s seat.
You give her an inch and you’re doomed to defeat.
Let her know you’re the boss. Man can’t live on his knees.
Fold the baby’s diapers any way that you please.
I’m the boss…
(Burl Ives tells it like it is.)
I think any rational, thinking person can agree with the supposition that those who rail against ‘the patriarchy’ and/or are otherwise deeply concerned with ‘social justice’ are, in the end, just spoiled brats who are unable to reason – in effect, children trapped in adult bodies.
In that vein, I think all of you will find the following essay very enjoyable:
http://newbostonpost.com/2017/11/09/undoing-the-dis-education-of-millennials/
They are. Too many helicopter parents, I guess. Good article though… they really are enslaved to feelings. This makes them easier to control, I suppose, which is the whole point.