Unless you’ve been living under a rock lately, you’ve probably heard about the Sarah Nyberg affair. Milo Yiannopoulos goes into detail on this issue far better than I possibly could. The short version is, Sarah “Butts” Nyberg, a transsexual, was outed as a pedophile who distributed child pornography and described her desires for her 8 year old cousin in despicable, disgusting fashion on an online forum she owned. She then admitted to many of the charges against her, but dismissed them by saying she had changed, and was no longer an “edgelord.” Right.
What you may not know is how the Social Justice Warriors responded to these charges. But my readers won’t exactly be shocked, either. The Left’s capacity for depravity is well-documented on The Declination. Phil Sandifer, self-proclaimed Post-Modernist Marxist Occultist, weighs in:
Phil “PedoPhil” Sandifer delivers an apologetic for Sarah Nyberg, declaring that those who outed her depravity committed a crime more serious than posting incestual child porn.
Not to be outdone, #Gamergate critic, and former NFL player Chris Kluwe Tweeted pictures of his own daughter to a pedophile, because The Narrative ™ must be protected at all cost. Yes. He sent pictures of his child to a pedophile. What kind of sick bastard would do such a thing? But these two paragons of morality, who constantly lecture us on our evil Capitalist ShitLord, Racist, Sexist, Homophobic, Rapist ways are only the tip of the ideological iceberg of depravity. Salon, naturally, decided that this was a great time to post an article defending pedophilia as a “sexual orientation” and not some kind of filth or evil.
The agenda, of course, is to force acceptance of this practice onto the population at large. And after pedophilia, what next? Soylent Green? There appears to be no floor, no bottom, to Social Justice evil.
But it gets worse, for child pornography and pedophilia are only two tiny drops in the Progressive bucket. In Sweden, a gay pride parade was organized, and it so happened that the proposed route went through two Muslim areas of town. Naturally, this created conflict because Muslims don’t like gays. They aren’t “homophobic” in the sense that they might find the practice odd, or would prefer if it took place someplace else. No. They kill gays. They hang them, they throw them off of buildings, they behead them.
So an LGBT group entered the fray to weigh in on this subject. Who did they back? Who wins when victim group meets victim group?
Islam won. Yes, the LGBT group accused its own people of being racist Islamophobes for daring to conduct their parade through an area of town in which Muslims resided. Leftists called each other racists and bowed to the wishes of militant Islam. Of course, Islam has a long and colorful history where pedophilia and rape are concerned too. In fact, one of the points of agreement between the Left and Islam is that child rape is no big deal, and wanting to have sex with your cousin is just dandy.
When Islam comes to our countries in force, when the guns come out and the chants of Allahu Ackbar echo in our streets, will the Leftists now clamoring in defense of pedophiles rally to defend their own homes?
The Progressives champion every one of these.
No. They will do as the LGBT group in Sweden did. They will recite the words that the Muslims demand of them and become good little Muslims, for they are cowards who have no testicles, no spine, no will to fight. They will surrender as soon as violent resistance comes for them. They are worse than Nazis and Stalinists, for at least those two groups, as evil as they were, were willing to fight. The Progressives are equally as evil, but almost comical in their farcical lack of fortitude. They have every vice. Greed. Sloth. Gluttony. Lust. Hubris. Envy. Wrath.
Do not treat with them. For if the Progressives fail in their quest to wreck Western civilization, they will take it over and surrender it to the Muslims at the first opportunity.
Leftists and muslims are a lot alike.
They both bully people into submission, they both want a world in which they are it’s brutal leaders, and they both are liars.
Hey, if a few thousand homosexuals have to die to bring about worldwide Marxism, that, as Joe Stalin once said, is a statistic.
I don’t know who Phil Sandifer is, but I’m wondering about his first tweet above. Is he really saying that some people are above the law to the extent that they should not be subject to scrutiny? So an exposé from the early 70s about Nixon, for example, is “morally abhorrent”? God, leftists are some messed up children.
The Left is opposed to the concept of moral standards, let alone the actuality. This is more than just a toddler-like reaction to the word “no”, as much as it might seem that way from reading and listening to them. It is a malignant embrace of evil.
I was thinking about the way that Leftist, whether Democrat, NAZI, Communist, Socialist, Peronist, whatever, always, always, find some groups and define away their humanity so they can justify killing them. (That idea originated with or from reading S. I. Hayakawa.) It seemed there was a need for a way to describe Democrats and other extreme Leftists that captured the fact of their malignant evil, but I didn’t want to fall into the same mental trap and define them out of the human race. It occurred to me that they are “feral” in the sense that they do not accept the standards of reason and morality that make civilization possible. Hence my use of the term “feral human” to describe Democrats and other extreme Leftists.
Once of Saul Alinsky’s observations seems to apply here: If you don’t have an opposition, you don’t have an issue. And of course, the “opposition” must be reified by being identified with a discernible group. Thus, to the Left, the “opposition” is given flesh, such that it can be focused upon, hated, and effectively vilified.
Two-minutes Hate.
It’s Nicholas. Nicholas Nyberg. He’s a man.
His status as a “man” is questionable, except in the most basic biological sense. Nonetheless, your point is well taken.
Some arguments deserve only to be met with withering contempt and mocking laughter. For instance, the above tweet from Captain Clueless about the unexpected super powers of “prominent” activists. Such lack of self-awareness is actually rather naive and charming – like a puppy pooping all over himself.
Phil Sandifer could certainly be described as a puppy pooping himself.
Note the advance of their demands over the decades: Tolerance, Acceptance, Approval, Promotion