I’ve spoken at length previous about why it is important to eliminate debt, and cultivate multiple sources of income. The most common and effective tactic in the SJW arsenal is to attack your income. They have tried it with me, though the perpetrator of that attack has since moved on to other targets, it would seem. I still suspect he’s out there, watching me (and others), for Facebook never shut down his group page despite many people reporting him for attempts at extortion.
In my case, the threat has lost much of its potential steam due to the explosive growth in my freelancing business of late. And my DJ business similarly remains strong, though it is possible the shooting in Orlando may cause a drop in the future. Who would have thought DJing a gay club would become a life-threatening proposition? But the point is, the weapon is still very potent for them. This is how they attacked Brendan Eich. This is how Tim Hunt found himself at the wrong end of an SJW crusade.
SJW attacks almost invariably focus on one’s income, be it a business, a regular job, or both. The owners of that coffee shop in Asheville sure found out the hard way. So did Justine Saccos, who made a dumb tweet and wound up at the forefront of an Internet crusade to have her fired before the plane she was on even landed.
There is even an entire website dedicated to ‘getting racists fired’. I won’t post the link here, but you can find it on your own easily enough if you’re brave enough to venture into the wretched hives of the Internet.
The point is, everything that SJWs do revolves around attacking your income. And every normal human being on Earth, without exception, has done something, said something, tweeted something or otherwise that could be spun into a Social Justice crusade. Perhaps you wore dreadlocks as a white guy? Maybe you attended an art show featuring a painting of kimono-clad people? Maybe you made a cheap joke about USB dongles?
Nobody knows what will set off the SJWs next, or whom they will target. But the attack vector is the same every time. It’s always about the money, you see. For a bunch of self-declared Communists who hate “greed”, they sure seem awfully focused on money. And the media pressure they command means that their cries of speaking Truth to Power are largely false. Most often, their charges are false. But even when the charges are accurate, it is they who command Establishment power. They have the favor of the ruling class, not us.
That’s why attacking the money works for them. If there was really a great big white supremacist patriarchy around, does anyone seriously think it would fire its own people merely because SJWs demanded it? That doesn’t even pass the sniff test. No, the powers-that-be clearly favor Social Justice, and desire its dictates to become de facto law.
For is one truly free to speak his mind if he is to be blacklisted and disemployed for uttering it? De jure freedom of speech is meaningless if not commonly acknowledged by the populace.
There is a far cry between people getting fired for saying something stupid during the course of their job, while representing the company or otherwise, and this behavior perpetrated by SJWs mobs. For they subject one’s private life to endless, hyper-vigilant scrutiny for potential thoughtcrimes, and then presume to stir up hate mobs for the express purpose of suppressing the speech they don’t like. It is de facto censorship.
What good is the written law giving you the right to speak, if the court of mob rule answers to a different code? So, where Socrates had to drink the hemlock for uttering what was unpopular, you merely have to suffer destitution and poverty. Gee, thanks SJWs.
I can’t say that I have ever, in the course of my life, tattled to someone’s employer because I didn’t like a joke, or a political statement, or anything like that. The thought didn’t even occur to me until SJWs started doing it. And even now, I find it to be the most reprehensible, ill-conceived, censorious, intellectual filth. The perpetrators of this behavior are human slime, certainly unfit to be lecturing the rest of us on moral uprightness and politeness as SJWs are wont to do.
And yet, for all this, they ask us the most ridiculous of questions: ‘why do you hide behind anonymity? What, are you a coward or something?’ Mr. X on Twitter mentions that one even asked for his client list.
The truth is, I don’t hide behind anonymity. Not anymore. My SJW attackers already know who I am, and while I generally don’t publish my personal details explicitly, further attempts to suppress this are probably in vain. So the choice is no longer open to me. And the damage they can do to me has been mitigated. But anyone not already personally known to the SJWs should stay that way.
Of course, they are trying to end anonymity anyway. They say such things as “On the Internet, no one can see that you’re a racist coward.” Clearly, they want to know who you are so that they can attack you post haste. Where they had to do some digging to locate me, they want it to be easier to enforce their mandated groupthink.
It doesn’t matter if you’re a racist or not, it only matters whether or not they like you. For if they do not like you, they can spin anything as racist. Did you, perhaps, say something a little hasty after you were robbed at gunpoint decades ago? I mean look at the transcript for Paula Deen:
Lawyer: Have you ever used the N-word yourself?
Deen: Yes, of course.
Lawyer: Okay. In what context?
Deen: Well, it was probably when a black man burst into the bank that I was working at and put a gun to my head.
Lawyer: Okay. And what did you say?
Deen: Well, I don’t remember, but the gun was dancing all around my temple … I didn’t — I didn’t feel real favorable towards him.
Lawyer: Okay. Well, did you use the N-word to him as he pointed a gun in your head at your face?
Deen: Absolutely not.
Lawyer: Well, then, when did you use it?
Deen: Probably in telling my husband.
Lawyer: Okay. Have you used it since then?
Deen: I’m sure I have, but it’s been a very long time.
Lawyer: Can you remember the context in which you have used the N-word?
Lawyer: Has it occurred with sufficient frequency that you cannot recall all of the various context in which you’ve used it?
Deen: No, no.
Lawyer: Well, then tell me the other context in which you’ve used the N-word?
Deen: I don’t know, maybe in repeating something that was said to me.
Lawyer: Like a joke?
Deen: No, probably a conversation between blacks. I don’t — I don’t know. But that’s just not a word that we use as time has gone on. Things have changed since the ‘60s in the south. And my children and my brother object to that word being used in any cruel or mean behavior. As well as I do.
We have reached a point where a woman can be condemned for calling a violent criminal who holds her at gunpoint by a racial epithet. If that can be spun into a charge of racism, what else could be? There is no protection from an SJW taking issue with you and attacking you this way. The authorities will not help and those who run Social Media platforms will not help either, for they tacitly support Social Justice causes and do not want to run afoul of them. The government is more likely to side with them, also.
So, in summary, you cannot prevent them from leveling a charge of x-ism against you (regardless of veracity), the charge would require a very strong burden of proof on your part to dispel, and the authorities, the media, and Social Media platforms will be arrayed against you.
And SJWs wonder why people want to stay anonymous? It would be utterly insane to support any other position. But even being anonymous is only a partial shield against their activity. If one overhears your joke at a conference, or another takes issue with your chosen attire or hair style, there is nothing you can do to stop them.
The best defense there is two-fold. First, address your debt-to-income ratio by keeping your debt-load light (zero if at all possible) and your savings large. Second, have multiple sources of income, or hardened sources that will not fall easily to SJW attack. If you have a business where your clients are unknown to your attackers, you will have an extra layer of security between you and impoverishment. If you have multiple jobs, one job can pick up the slack if another is taken from you. If your employer is staunchly opposed to SJW activities, even better, for your employer may leap to your defense.
To some extent, I cultivate SJW rage by commenting on the social and political issues of our time, and so it is probably more likely that those who do likewise will be attacked. But I doubt the USB dongle joke guys thought they would be subjected to a hate mob, nor did Justine Saccos understand the potential implications of her tweet. Anybody, no matter how innocent and far removed from the den of vipers that is politics, may be subjected to SJW assault.
Best to be prepared at all times.